Search This Blog

Thursday, March 15, 2007

Revised Key Stage 3

Revised Key Stage 3 Programme of Study.

The proposed new Key Stage 3 programme of study can be seen on the QCA website. An online response form is also available and colleagues will, no doubt wish to respond. It would be a good focus for a departmental discussion for instance. The final version should be available in autumn 2007 ready for first teaching in September 2008. The QCA website has useful background and supporting material about the revisions to the whole KS3 curriculum which are helpful.

Some ideas:

The PoS for art has been designed to be less prescriptive and also backwards compatible. This means that if schools are following the national curriculum now they should not need to change anything. However, there is a clear obligation to audit current practice to ensure that it does comply with the the PoS. Some departments and teachers will use this as an opportunity to make significant changes to their current practice. KS3 is the last period of statutory art education and art teachers, like those in other subjects, will see this as an opportunity to explore what sort of entitlement, experience and expertise they want to provide for their students. This should be more than a prelude to GCSE.

The PoS comes with a popup glossary which is helpful in suggesting interpretations but is not statutory. One approach to the PoS in a department could be to ensure that a common understanding is developed and a redefinition of terms could be a good way of establishing this. For instance, 'creative environments' is described thus 'This includes experience working in museums and galleries'. But schools might ask "How do we want to interpret the notion of a creative environment in this school?"

Teachers learn best from other teachers and the site includes some examples of how teachers might use the new PoS. There will be more examplars with time and this will be helpful.

Assessment is a problem, however. There are currently no plans to make any significant changes to the level descriptions. These are built quite explicitly on the current (three strand) programme of study. However, the new PoS does not follow the three strand pattern but introduces a new conceptual framework for the subject 'explore and create' and 'understand and evaluate'. A two strand, or four strand, model depending on how it is used. This will lead to a situation in which learning is planned according to one framework, but assessed using another - clearly an unsatisfactory situation. It is possible to repack the three strands into the two strand model and vice-versa - possible perhaps, desirable no. If the situation remains then teachers will have to square this circle somehow.

The new PoS does explicitly refer to critical understanding (key concepts) with a broad cultural reference point. It requires understanding of both, the cultural context and characteristics, and also consideration of the role of the artist. This should guide us to think more carefully about the nature of culture and be mindful of presenting dot paintings masquerading as aboriginal art and other examples of multicultural art which are too close to parodies of Victorian stereotypes - and as a consequence in all probability illegal under the Race Relations Act.

The PoS recognises the need to include 'contemporary practice' (range and content). The principle of ensuring that art education does not come to an end in the 1970's of pop art is to be applauded by art teachers but the pragmatic difficulties of getting first hand experience may tax schools. However, the thrust of creating a curriculum of local distinctiveness that permeates the whole KS3 agenda suggests that schools should be more willing to explore the options open to them.

Creativity: It is surprising that the definition of creativity in the new PoS singularly fails to reflect the characteristics of creativity which have been accepted by all since the NACCCE report and which are a part of QCA definition of creativity anyway. This will make it harder to engage in the pursuit of creativity in partnership with others

Aims; For the first time the general aims are statutory. This means that teachers should take account in their teaching of the need for learners to 'enjoy learning' and to become 'confident individuals' etc. This is proper and no more than the ECM expectations but it should be included in the curriculum audit and departmental SEF.

'Explore and create' - 'Understand and evaluate'; This is a good model and to an extent suggests a distinction between practical skills and intellectual processes. This could be helpful, for instance, in recognising the sources of evidence for assessment (practical work on the one hand, and behaviour, writing or discussion to provide evidence of understanding on the other) but is not as clear as it might be and some strands almost seem to be duplicated. It is possible to offer them up to the current three strand model, but to do so does change the conceptual frame of reference.

Applied contexts and New Technologies; It is good to see that 'the study of art and design should include both applied and fine art practices' and 'work in 2D, 3D and new technologies'. The key words being 'should' and 'and'. This 'should' mean that applied work and new technologies will increasingly become an entitlement and this 'should' support progression to the new Diploma in creative and media studies.

Thursday, March 08, 2007

Should we allow nudes?

I got an interesting question from a head of department the other day. It had been suggested to him that 6th form students should not use the nude in their work. He asked what other schools were doing. Here is my reply:

"An interesting question which, to a certain extent relates to the cultural climate within the school rather than to any given set of rules or protocols. I know several schools that offer life drawing either in school or sometimes at the art school. These are usually done after school, or as special events and do include both male and female 6th form students and male and female models. These studies are used as the basis for paintings in some cases (as in Jenny Saville). In these cases the study of the nude is managed by the school and has clear references to normal art practice and to the practice of western artists for centuries. It involves a professional model and the session is carefully managed - parents are informed and it is not compulsory. In fact I have just talked to the head of art in an Upper school who has just finished an 8 week, after school, life class for the 6th form and a few invited, talented, yr10 and Yr11 students. He said it has been one of the most valuable experiences students have had and that it has made a significant contribution to raising standards. I would have thought a managed life class would be appropriate at 6th form level in most schools. However, in some schools, perhaps Catholic Schools or other faith schools, this might be deemed inappropriate although I have not found this to be the case in the church schools I know.

I think that care should be taken where students are drawing or working from non-professional models, themselves or friends for instance, and in all cases where this has happened the models are not completely nude and would be wearing the equivalent of a swimming costume. The same would be true of figure work based upon students own photographs. Often these are quite intense pictures which have a great significance for the students involved. They indicate great trust between the student, the teacher and the ethos of the art department and often they are some of the most moving and significant art I see in schools.

It is hard to see how it is possible to avoid looking at nudes if one is studying Western Art and by and large students at KS4, KS5 will be quite familiar with the notion. Sometimes they may draw on this art as a reference point in their own work. Although copying from artists is not good as an end product, there is certainly a place for studying and using the work of professional artists and this will involve practical responses at times. I guess the issue here is the context and reason the student might have for working from a Gaugin nude. The intellectual raison d'etre for studying the nude should be easy to articulate by older school students studying art. KS3 students may be exposed to nudes in western Art in their course of study but it is seldom a main focus - apart from highly stylised depictions of the nude form. They cannot, of course, visit Tate Britain, or Tate Modern, without seeing nudes and primary schools visit these galleries all the time.

As to Islamic students: I have worked on a working party to explore some of these issues including representatives of the muslim community in Wycombe. My understanding is that in Islam it is good to study and to study other cultures. So it is not wrong to study western art and this will include the realistic depiction of figures. Teachers should be sensitive and should not embarrass, female, Muslim students in particular, who may feel that they do not wish to study pictures of nudes. Some Muslims also believe it is wrong for them to portray the human figure as this is blasphemy because it emulates creation, which can only be done by Allah. It would clearly be wrong to require such students to paint/draw a figure: and certainly not a nude figure. They may also not wish to discuss the work of fellow students who are working from life.

Ultimately it is a matter for the school. However, with sensitive and professional handling (and noting the caveat about Muslim pupils beliefs and feelings) I personally see no reason why students at KS 4 and P16 should not learn about the nude in western art, use images of the human form in their own art and in managed circumstances study the nude model in life classes. This is managed sensitively in other schools and contributes to the learning of students - often by requiring mature reflection about art and its purpose in relation to the human condition."